444
If an Order of arrest on foreign territory, nor without the limits of his jurisdiction. It is only by application to a Judge of another for the arrest of a Culprit, and as regards foreign Countries, such requisitions are preferred by the Government Authorities.
That which is required by paragraph 2. appears to me to be too much. Although absolutely people proceeded against at Macao, the provisions of para. 3 would be acceptable.
Paragraph 4 is unjust.
The difficulties commence at Paragraph 5, which empowers British Courts to decide on evidence the justice of the claim preferred for the surrender of a Culprit, and allows the latter a right to contest such claim under the provisions set forth in paragraphs 6 and 7, as also under paragraphs 8 and 9, referring to Ordinance No.4 of 1844, which latter appears to authorize the delays, and the danger of rendering useless the Requisition of the Governor of Macao, as it is to be apprehended from Article 7 and those preceding, from 7 to 13 especially.
I think therefore, it would be advisable to offer to the consideration of His Excellency The Governor of Hong Kong and his Council the basis of the Treaty of Extradition between Portugal and Spain or the so called Convention of 13th January.
444
ifre an Order of arrest on foreign
territory.
nor without the limits of his jurisdiction. It is only by application
ihist
a
Judge
ast's another for the arrest.
of a Culprit, and as regards Pereign=
Countries, such requisitions
are preferred by the Government Archorities.
That which is required by paragraph
2. appears to
me to be too much
Although absout people
proceeded
are not
agonist at Macao, the provisions
of para. 3 would be accepitable.
4
Paragraph
hu
just.
40
M
inquestionably
The difficulties
commence at Pararé; which empowers Brilish Courts to decide on evidence the pristice of the claim
preferred for the surrender of a Quépuit, and allows the latter a right to contest such claim under the provisions set forth in paragraphs & and b, as also under paragraphs | and: 8, and.) 9 "referring to Ordinance N.4 of 1848, which latter appears to authorize the delays, and the danger of rendering uscles the
Requisition of the Governor of Macas, as
it is to be apprehended from Artide
ル
and those freeeding, from 7 to 13 especially
I think therefore, it would be advisable to offer to the consideration of this Excellency The Governor of thongthong and his Carnal the bans of the Treaty of Extradition between Portugal and Sprains or the so called Convention of 13th January
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.